Blog

New York Business Litigation Attorney | New York Breach of Contract Attorney

Defective Products

Car Accidents

General

view all

News

view all

Library

Car Accidents

view all

Slip/Trip and Fall Accidents

view all

Construction Site Accidents

view all

Child Injuries

view all

Defective Products

view all

Newsletters

view all

General

view all

Case Results

Car Accidents

more

Defective Products

more

Other

more

FAQs

Car Accidents

Defective Products

General

view all

1.866.374.1164
Blog Category:

Car Accidents

1/29/2010
Jonathan Cooper
Comments (0)

Appeals Court Limits Adverse Impact of Attorney's Admission in Opening Statement

Apparently I'm not the only one who empathized with the plaintiff's trial lawyer in this case; the Appellate Division felt the same way.

In Beshay v. Eberhart, L.P., the plaintiff sustained serious personal injuries to his eye when, after removing his safety goggles for a short time, a piece from a circular saw that was being operated by one of his co-workers flew off and into his unprotected eye.

Based upon his attorney's statement during his opening remarks to the jury that the plaintiff had voluntarily removed the safety goggles he had been provided before the accident, the trial judge not only dismissed the plaintiff's claims that the defendants were liable under Labor Law section 241(6) (which imposes liability for specific statutory safety violations), but went further and dismissed the plaintiff's claims in their entirety - including those for common law negligence and strict products liability.

In reinstating the majority of the plaintiff's claims, the Appellate Court noted that the lower court had gone too far, and cited the following general rule:

"A dismissal of a complaint after the opening statement of a plaintiff's attorney is warranted only where it can be demonstrated either (1) that the complaint does not state a cause of action, (2) that a cause of action that is otherwise stated is conclusively defeated by something interposed by way of a defense and clearly admitted as a fact, or (3) that the counsel for the plaintiff, in his or her opening statement, by some admission or statement of fact, so completely compromised his or her case that the court was justified in awarding judgment as a matter of law to one or more defendants."

Since the plaintiff's attorney said nothing that compromised plaintiff's common law negligence or defective products claims, the trial court erred in dismissing those claims.

Long Island, New York trial lawyer Jonathan Cooper represents small businesses and individuals in breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, commercial litigation, personal injury and defective products cases in Nassau, Queens, Brooklyn, Bronx, New York City, Suffolk and Westchester. In order to schedule a free consultation with Mr. Cooper, please contact his main office located in Cedarhurst, Long Island at 516.791.5700.



There are no comments.

Post a comment

Post a Comment to "Appeals Court Limits Adverse Impact of Attorney's Admission in Opening Statement"

To reply to this message, enter your reply in the box labeled "Message", hit "Post Message."

Name:*

Email:* (will not be published)

Website:

Message:

Notify me of follow-up comments via email.

For security purposes, please enter the graphic text in the box below: [hit F5 if you can not read the text]

Let our legal experts review your case, and we'll help you obtain the compensation you deserve. Begin your case review by filling out the form below:

Name:

Phone:

Email:

Tell us more:


Law Offices of Jonathan M. Cooper
483 Chestnut St.
Cedarhurst NY 11516
Phone: 516.791.5700
Fax: 516.791.8188
Get Directions

New York City
135 West 29th Street
Suite 801
New York, NY 10001 Get Directions