Blog

Construction Site Accidents

Car Accidents

Slip/Trip and Fall Accidents

Child Injuries

Defective Products

General

New York Business Litigation Attorney | New York Breach of Contract Attorney

view all

News

view all

Library

Construction Site Accidents

view all

Car Accidents

view all

Slip/Trip and Fall Accidents

view all

Child Injuries

view all

Defective Products

view all

Newsletters

view all

General

view all

Case Results

Construction Site Accidents

more

Car Accidents

more

Slip/Trip and Fall Accidents

more

Child Injuries

more

Defective Products

more

Other

more

FAQs

Construction Site Accidents

Car Accidents

Slip/Trip and Fall Accidents

Child Injuries

Defective Products

General

view all

1.866.374.1164

How To Prove A Breach of Implied Warranty Claim Under New York Law

Unlike its cousin, the breach of express warranty, which is based upon a clear, unmistakable promise, advertisement or contract provision, the breach of implied warranty is far more nebulous; under this theory, a defendant can be held liable for damages (including personal injury) under either one of two circumstances:

  1. If the product was not fit for its reasonably foreseaable use; or,
  2. If the product was not fit for its intended purpose.

To better clarify the former theory of liability, here are two examples:

Although a folding chair is not intended for use as a stepstool for changing lightbulbs, chances are that this would still be deemed a foreseeable use of this product. Conversely, a jury is unlikely to find it foreseeable that a folding chair would be used as a makeshift flyswatter or baseball bat.

In a parallel, albeit simpler vein, a defendant can be held liable for damages - even in the absence of an explicit warranty - if the product fails to perform in its expected manner. In point of fact, this theory comes up rather frequently in the realty context, where a tenant seeks an offset to their rent based upon the landlord or owner's breach of the implied warranty of habitability.

As a final note, it bears repeating that since a claim for breach of implied warranty is essentially a breach of contract claim, the plaintiff will still need to prove privity of contract, i.e., that he or she dealt directly with the defendant that is being sued on this claim. Consequently, in the defective products context, a plaintiiff will often have difficulty proving a breach of imlied warranty claim against those higher up and more removed in the product's chain of distribution, such as the manufacturer or distributor.


GET YOUR FREE COPY

"Why There So Few Successful Defective Products Lawsuits" is intended to help those who have been injured by defective or dangerous products in New York State.

This Free eBook addresses important topics including how the products liability laws play an important role in insuring the public's safety from unsafe products, what you need to prove to win your defective products lawsuit, and what the typical defenses to defective products lawsuits are, and why those defenses are so formidable. Click here to get your free copy.

Contact Long Island, New York defective products attorney Jonathan Cooper now for a FREE consultation regarding your dangerous products lawsuit. There is no obligation to hire a lawyer.  There is no fee until Nassau County, New York personal injury attorney Jonathan Cooper successfully recovers fair compensation for you.

 

Bookmark and Share