Blog

Construction Site Accidents

Car Accidents

Slip/Trip and Fall Accidents

Child Injuries

Defective Products

General

New York Business Litigation Attorney | New York Breach of Contract Attorney

view all

News

view all

Library

Construction Site Accidents

view all

Car Accidents

view all

Slip/Trip and Fall Accidents

view all

Child Injuries

view all

Defective Products

view all

Newsletters

view all

General

view all

Case Results

Construction Site Accidents

more

Car Accidents

more

Slip/Trip and Fall Accidents

more

Child Injuries

more

Defective Products

more

Other

more

FAQs

Construction Site Accidents

Car Accidents

Slip/Trip and Fall Accidents

Child Injuries

Defective Products

General

view all

1.866.374.1164

Why Shipyard Accidents Do Not Qualify For Protection Under New York's Labor Laws

In Lee v. Astoria Generating Co., L.P., a recent decision that was handed down by New York's Court of Appeals, the plaintiff suffered serious personal injuries while he was working on an electrical turbine generator that his employer, the third party defendant, had been hired to overhaul. This generator was attached to a barge that was moored in the Gowanus Canal, where other than once a decade, it remained stationary. More specifically, the accident occurred when the plaintiff slipped and fell roughly 8' while going down a hatch that was located at the top of the 15' high housing that held the generator. Importantly, the plaintiff was not given any safety equipment to descend into the unit, in contravention of New York’s Labor Law §§240(1), 241(6) and 200. (For more on these statutory provisions, please see "Construction Accident Liability Under New York Law"). Or so it seemed to the plaintiff.

In this case, the owners and the plaintiff’s employer eventually moved for to dismiss the complaint, and asserted that plaintiff’s Labor Law strict liability claims were barred because the barge was as a “vessel” under 33 USC §905(b), which limits a third-party recovery to a negligence theory, and that the defendant owners, who lacked supervision and control, were not negligent.

The Appellate Division agreed with the plaintiff's argument that since the barge upon which the generator was stationed was permanently anchored, it should not be considered a "vessel" under the Longshoreman's Workers' Compensation Act. But that is not the end of the story. The Court of Appeals then reversed and dismissed the plaintiff's claim, holding that the plaintiff's claims were pre-empted, or barred, by LHWCA §905(b), which "permits an injured person covered under the Act to bring an action in negligence against a vessel, which “shall be exclusive of all remedies against the vessel except remedies available under this chapter.”


Long Island, New York trial lawyer Jonathan Cooper represents businesses and individuals in business and commercial litigation cases including breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, as well as New York child accidents,  construction site accidents and personal injury cases.

Jonathan Cooper practices in Nassau, Queens, Brooklyn, Bronx, New York City and Westchester, and is the published author of a FREE Book on New York accident lawsuits entitled "Why Most Accident Victims Do Not Recover the Full Value of Their Claim," and "Why There Are So Few Successful Defective Products Lawsuits."  In order to schedule a free consultation with Mr. Cooper, please contact his main office located in Cedarhurst, Long Island at 516.791.5700.
Bookmark and Share