Blog

Construction Site Accidents

Car Accidents

Slip/Trip and Fall Accidents

Child Injuries/School Negligence

Defective Products

General

New York Business Litigation Attorney | New York Breach of Contract Attorney

view all

News

view all

Library

Construction Site Accidents

view all

Car Accidents

view all

Slip/Trip and Fall Accidents

view all

Child Injuries/School Negligence

view all

Defective Products

view all

Newsletters

view all

General

view all

Case Results

Construction Site Accidents

more

Car Accidents

more

Slip/Trip and Fall Accidents

more

Child Injuries/School Negligence

more

Defective Products

more

Other

more

FAQs

Construction Site Accidents

Car Accidents

Slip/Trip and Fall Accidents

Child Injuries/School Negligence

Defective Products

General

view all

1.866.374.1164

Why Some Bicycle Accident Claims Are Barred Under New York Law

A recent decision by a New York appellate Court has inspired us to revisit our blog post, Play At Your Own Risk: A Valid Legal Concept? and to provide more information and greater detail regarding what a plaintiff must prove in order to win a personal injury lawsuit arising out of a bicycle riding accident. In Cotty v. Town of Southampton, the plaintiff was hurt when another bicyclist who was riding ahead of plaintiff fell in an unfinished portion of roadway, causing a passing car to veer from this bicyclist and into plaintiff's body. In this case, the plaintiff argued that the municipality should be held liable for her injuries because they failed to either mark or barricade the unfinished roadway. On the other hand, the defendants moved to dismiss this bicycle accident lawsuit in its entirety on the grounds that plaintiff inherently assumed the risk that she could be injured the second that she mounted that bicycle.

In siding with the plaintiff on this issue, the appellate court held that although the assumption of risk doctrine may bar certain claims with regard to sporting activities, they were unwilling to say that a claimant, or plaintiff, inherently permits the local municipality or its independent contractor to negligently repair or maintain its roadways. According to the court, a contrary result - which would greatly expand the assumption of risk doctrine - would sginficantly lessen municipal or contractor culpability for negligent maintenance, and thereby pose a greater danger to the public.

Thus, the litmus test appears to be the following: if the injury results from an activity that is inherent in the sport, the claim is barred. As applied to bicycle riding, the appellate court held that injuries related to off-road, or mountain, bike riding would be barred; in contrast, leisure bike riding, even if part of a club, would likely be permitted to survive.

GET YOUR FREE COPY

"Why Most Accident Victims Do Not Recover the Full Value of Their Claim" is intended to help New Yorkers assure that they avoid some 10 simple mistakes that will almost certainly reduce the value of their accident claim, whether it results from a construction site accident, a car accident, motorcycle or bicycle accident, or even a trip and fall over a defective or cracked sidewalk.

The book addresses important topics including what you need to prove to win your accident case, and identifies some of the most common pitfalls to these cases. Click on the link above to get your FREE eBook on New York accident cases. Contact Long Island, New York accident attorney Jonathan Cooper at 516.791.5700 for a FREE consultation regarding your negligence case. There is no obligation to hire a lawyer.  There is no fee until personal injury lawyer Jonathan Cooper successfully recovers fair compensation for you.
Bookmark and Share