Blog

Car Accidents

view all

Library

Car Accidents

view all

Case Results

School Negligence / Negligent Supervision

more

Construction Site Accidents

more

Car Accidents

more

Slip / Trip and Fall Accidents

more

Defective Products

more

Other

more

1.866.374.1164

Dangerous Intersections: Municipal Liability Under New York Law

As noted in our blog post, a California jury’s finding that the local government was largely responsible for a collision between the driver of a car and a teenage boy riding his bicycle seems certain to be appealed in the next few weeks. The question is, what would the law be if this case were venued in New York instead of California?

I’m sure this will not come as any shock to you, but the short answer is that it depends on the nature of the specific manner in which the plaintiff claims that the municipality was negligent, more specifically, whether the municipality was actively negligent (which is simpler to prove), or whether they were passively negligent, in other words, that the government is liable for their omission rather than their commission.

As a threshold matter, New York law holds municipalities, whether we are talking about the state, city, county, village or town, responsible to assure that their roadways are maintained in a safe condition. As stated above, the nature of the proof required to prevail on a negligence claim in these cases can vary rather widely. Following is a brief summary of the two primary allegations that can be made under New York law.

  • Active Negligence. Under this theory, the plaintiff contends that the defendant municipality should be held liable because they, through their employees, were negligent in their repair, installation or construction of a traffic control device, and that this negligence was an important contributing factor to the car accident.
  • Passive Negligence. In order for a plaintiff to prevail on this theory of liability, however, the plaintiff must prove the following: (a) that the municipality was clearly aware that a dangerous condition was present on this roadway or at this particular intersection; (b) that despite this knowledge, the municipality either failed to investigate or conduct a traffic study of this condition, or that the study which it performed was patently insufficient; in the alternative, (c) that the municipality had no valid reason for failing to install an appropriate traffic control device at that specific location; and, (d) that the municipality’s negligence played a significant role, i.e., reasonable people could consider it an important factor, for causing the car or pedestrian accident.
  • An important example of where a municipality can be held liable in tort for either its affirmative acts or its failure to act is if the municipality either negligently installs, or negligently fails to properly maintain its traffic control devices to assure that they are readily seen by drivers that would be obliged to obey those particular signs.

    As a final, parenthetical note, it is generally more difficult to prove a case under the latter theory than under the former one because you may have a hard time demonstrating that the municipality had specific knowledge, i.e., such as prior written notice, of the dangerous condition long enough before the accident that they could have remedied the situation and thereby prevented the accident from occurring.

    Unlike some other cases where you very well might not need the services of a lawyer, such as when you are merely trying to recover money under your insurance policy for the property damage to your car, personal injury cases against municipalities based upon their negligent failure to either design or maintain properly their roads, intersections or traffic control devices is rather complicated. Therefore, should your case fall into this category, I strongly recommend that you contact an appropriately qualified lawyer to advise you on your best course of action.





    GET YOUR FREE COPY

    "Why Most Accident Victims Do Not Recover the Full Value of Their Claim" is intended to help New Yorkers assure that they avoid some 10 simple mistakes that will almost certainly reduce the value of their accident claim, whether it results from a construction site accident, a car accident, motorcycle or bicycle accident, or even a trip and fall over a defective or cracked sidewalk.

    The book addresses important topics including what you need to prove to win your accident case, and identifies some of the most common pitfalls to these cases. Click on the link above to get your FREE eBook on New York accident cases. Contact Long Island, New York accident attorney Jonathan Cooper at 516.791.5700 for a FREE consultation regarding your negligence case. There is no obligation to hire a lawyer.  There is no fee until personal injury lawyer Jonathan Cooper successfully recovers fair compensation for you.

    Let our legal experts review your case, and we'll help you obtain the compensation you deserve. Begin your case review by filling out the form below:

    First Name *

    Last Name *

    Email *

    Phone *

    Tell Us More


    Law Offices of Jonathan M. Cooper
    483 Chestnut St.
    Cedarhurst NY 11516
    Phone: 516.791.5700
    Fax: 516.791.8188
    Get Directions

    New York City
    135 West 29th Street
    Suite 801
    New York, NY 10001 Get Directions

    FAQs

    School Negligence / Negligent Supervision

    Construction Site Accidents

    Car Accidents

    Slip / Trip and Fall Accidents

    Defective Products

    General

    view all