Blog

Construction Site Accidents

Car Accidents

Slip/Trip and Fall Accidents

Child Injuries

Defective Products

General

New York Business Litigation Attorney | New York Breach of Contract Attorney

view all

News

view all

Library

Construction Site Accidents

view all

Car Accidents

view all

Slip/Trip and Fall Accidents

view all

Child Injuries

view all

Defective Products

view all

Newsletters

view all

General

view all

Case Results

Construction Site Accidents

more

Car Accidents

more

Slip/Trip and Fall Accidents

more

Child Injuries

more

Defective Products

more

Other

more

FAQs

Construction Site Accidents

Car Accidents

Slip/Trip and Fall Accidents

Child Injuries

Defective Products

General

view all

1.866.374.1164

The Fatal Mistake That Can Ruin Your Construction Site Accident Case in New York

In Cocoli v. Champion Construction Corp., a trial court judge in Kings County (Brooklyn), New York, handed down a decision that serves as an important reminder of what is the most commonly asserted - and most potent - defense to a construction site accident (or Labor Law) claim - the recalcitrant worker defense.

Although this defense is clearly grounded in common sense, its significance becomes more apparent when viewed in the overall context of how New York's Labor Laws pertain to construction site accidents. By way of background, it must be understood that New York's legislature enacted certain laws, as codified in sections 200, 240 and 241 of the Labor Law, in order to assure that construction site workers would be provided with all the necessary safety devices to protect them from elevation-related risks, such as scaffolding and ladders. As noted in What A Plaintiff Must Prove to Win A Construction Site Accident Case, construction site owners, as well as the contractors at the work site can be held automatically liable for workers' injuries under certain circumstances. And make no mistake, this result is the product of a deliberate design; it was and is intended to assure that these parties have substantial financial incentive to assure worker safety because they are in the best overall position to do so.

But there are two very important exceptions to this rule: if the worker was provided with a safety device, and then disobeyed "an immediate, specific instruction" to use that safety device, or, in the alternative, if the worker disobeyed a specific instruction to avoid using a particular unsafe device. And in those cases, the plaintiff's case may be dismissed.

Certainly, this rule makes a lot of sense. But considering the backdrop of Labor Law's statutory scheme, and the Court of Appeals' holding that the provisions imposing liability on the owners and contractors are to be "construed as liberally as possible in order to accomplish its protective goals," this exception should not be taken for granted.



Long Island, New York  child accident attorney, construction site accident and personal injury lawyer Jonathan Cooper practices in Nassau, Queens, Brooklyn, Bronx, New York City and Westchester. In order to order a FREE copy of his Book on New York accident lawsuits entitled "Why Most Accident Victims Do Not Recover the Full Value of Their Claim," or to schedule a free consultation with Mr. Cooper, please contact his main office located in Cedarhurst, Long Island at 516.791.5700.
Bookmark and Share