Blog

Construction Site Accidents

Car Accidents

Slip/Trip and Fall Accidents

Child Injuries

Defective Products

General

New York Business Litigation Attorney | New York Breach of Contract Attorney

view all

News

view all

Library

Construction Site Accidents

view all

Car Accidents

view all

Slip/Trip and Fall Accidents

view all

Child Injuries

view all

Defective Products

view all

Newsletters

view all

General

view all

Case Results

Construction Site Accidents

more

Car Accidents

more

Slip/Trip and Fall Accidents

more

Child Injuries

more

Defective Products

more

Other

more

FAQs

Construction Site Accidents

Car Accidents

Slip/Trip and Fall Accidents

Child Injuries

Defective Products

General

view all

1.866.374.1164

How To Prove A Failure To Warn Claim Under New York Law

As a corollary to our earlier article, "The 5 Ways to Prove Your Defective Products Claim," this article aims to expand upon one of those 5 categories, the defective products lawsuit that is based upon failure to warn cause of action. Generally speaking, the manufacturer of a product is duty-bound to apprise, or warn consumers about the hidden dangers that are associated with a consumer’s foreseeable use of its product -- even if the particular use is an unintended one, and even if the product is not otherwise defective. (Naturally, if the danger is present even where the use of the product is one contemplated by the manufacturer, then the plaintiff will also have a claim that the product was defectively designed.)

Since this particular type of claim is often litigated in the pharmaceutical context, I will provide a typical example. Pharmaceutical company P manufactures a drug which it has reason to know can cause the negative side effect of excessive bleeding in pregnant women, but fails to disclose it to consumers in its warnings. Woman W, who is pregnant, and is particularly concerned about vaginal bleeding due to her particular medical history, suffers hemorrhaging which requires corrective emergency surgery as a direct result of taking this drug. Had W known that P’s drug has this possible side effect, she would have used the comparable drug manufactured by C, which does not have this side effect.

In order to prevail on this theory, the plaintiff will have to prove that if adequate warnings had been provided, the injury would not have occurred.

Importantly, and as a practical matter, this burden is often difficult to meet, because the defenses to this claim are typically quite formidable. In particular, defendants often rely on their apparent compliance with labeling requirements promulgated by the relevant overseeing body (such as the FDA) as proof that they acted properly. Therefore, even where they believe that they have a viable failure to warn claim, plaintiffs will almost always claim at least one more of the other 5 bases for bringing a defective products lawsuit.



GET YOUR FREE COPY

"Why There So Few Successful Defective Products Lawsuits" is intended to help those who have been injured by defective or dangerous products in New York State.

This Free eBook addresses important topics including how the products liability laws play an important role in insuring the public's safety from unsafe products, what you need to prove to win your defective products lawsuit, and what the typical defenses to defective products lawsuits are, and why those defenses are so formidable. Click here to get your free copy.

Contact Long Island, New York defective products attorney Jonathan Cooper now for a FREE consultation regarding your dangerous products lawsuit. There is no obligation to hire a lawyer.  There is no fee until Nassau County, New York personal injury attorney Jonathan Cooper successfully recovers fair compensation for you.

 

Bookmark and Share