Blog

Construction Site Accidents

Car Accidents

Slip/Trip and Fall Accidents

Child Injuries

Defective Products

General

New York Business Litigation Attorney | New York Breach of Contract Attorney

view all

News

view all

Library

Construction Site Accidents

view all

Car Accidents

view all

Slip/Trip and Fall Accidents

view all

Child Injuries

view all

Defective Products

view all

Newsletters

view all

General

view all

Case Results

Construction Site Accidents

more

Car Accidents

more

Slip/Trip and Fall Accidents

more

Child Injuries

more

Defective Products

more

Other

more

FAQs

Construction Site Accidents

Car Accidents

Slip/Trip and Fall Accidents

Child Injuries

Defective Products

General

view all

1.866.374.1164

How To Prove That A Product Was Defectively Designed Under NY Law

In a design defect case, the plaintiff claims that the entire model line or a particular feature of an entire model line of the product is defective. In terms of everyday examples, the best illustrations of this concept are seen by consumer product recalls, for they are typically issued when there is a defect that is common to every one (or nearly every one) of the products that rolled off of the assembly line.

Under New York law, a manufacturer is liable for different types of product defects: it has a duty to design its product in such a way that it does not unreasonably risk harming anyone – whether the product’s user or any third parties – so long as the product is being used in a foreseeable manner. Consequently, there are circumstances where a manufacturer can be held liable even if the plaintiff did not use the product in its intended fashion.

Burden of Proof:
New York’s courts have required plaintiffs to demonstrate that a product fails a seven-factor test in order to demonstrate that the product is defectively designed. These factors include considering the following: (a) the product’s utility to the public as a whole and to the individual user; (b) the likelihood that the product will cause injury; (c) the availability (and feasibility) of a safer alternative design; and, (d) the degree of awareness of the product's potential danger that can reasonably be attributed to the injured user.

Illustration: In a case that I handled a few years ago, the plaintiffs were severely burned when the floor lacquer that they were using to finish an apartment floor spontaneously ignited. The plaintiffs’ expert opined that the floor lacquer was defectively designed because safer, less flammable alternative lacquers were available, and were unlikely to have ignited under the same conditions. The expert further opined that these alternative formulations were available at the time of occurrence at a comparable cost.



GET YOUR FREE COPY

"Why There So Few Successful Defective Products Lawsuits" is intended to help those who have been injured by defective or dangerous products in New York State.

This Free eBook addresses important topics including how the products liability laws play an important role in insuring the public's safety from unsafe products, what you need to prove to win your defective products lawsuit, and what the typical defenses to defective products lawsuits are, and why those defenses are so formidable. Click here to get your free copy.

Contact Long Island, New York defective products attorney Jonathan Cooper now for a FREE consultation regarding your dangerous products lawsuit. There is no obligation to hire a lawyer.  There is no fee until Nassau County, New York personal injury attorney Jonathan Cooper successfully recovers fair compensation for you.

 

Bookmark and Share