Image: Master isolated images/FreeDigitalPhotos.net
There are certain basic things you need to prove to win commercial or business litigation claims, and particularly so in the breach of contract and non-compete realm. And it can't be based on guesswork or just wishful thinking.
Let's be perfectly clear: I'm talking about the damages that you sustained as a direct result of the other side's breach of your agreement (or duty of loyalty, as the case may be).
Lest you think I'm being overly harsh, consider the following case from a few years back; in my view, it would be a perennial contender for "most absurd lawsuit."
Why Your Breach of Contract Damages Can't Be Based on Mere Guesswork
In Kassis Management, Inc. v. Verizon New York, Inc., the plaintiff claimed damages in breach of contract and consumer fraud as a result of Verizon's "promise" to move its phone service from one location to their new business location at no cost, and then later told plaintiff that it would only do so for an "excessive" fee.
Not surprisingly, when questioned under oath at a deposition, the plaintiff's chief executive was "unable to quantify the incoming calls directed to plaintiff during non-business hours during [the relevant time period] nor was he able to identify any business opportunities that plaintiff lost due to missed phone calls."
(How did the plaintiff's attorneys not know this before they actually went ahead and brought the lawsuit?)
The result of the lawsuit was equally unsurprising: the case was dismissed because, in the words of the court,
"Lost profits must be measured by reliable factors which go beyond mere speculation ...
"While such profits need not be proven with mathematical precision, there needs to be more proof than what has been offered by plaintiff. See Locke v. Aston, 1AD3d 160, 161-2 [1st Dept 2003]. Much of the documentary evidence is not actually verifiable. Therefore, the court must dismiss this action based on the lack of reasonable certainty in calculating the injury to plaintiff."