Go to navigation Go to content
Toll-Free: (888) 497-3410
Phone: 516.791.5700
Law Offices of Jonathan M. Cooper

Why Failing to Provide a Crossing Guard Isn't Negligence in New York

Unfortunately, ever year there are a number of incidents where school children are involved in accidents with passing cars or buses. And in some cases, it seems that the accident could have been prevented - if only the school or district had provided a crossing guard (or in some cases, had the crossing guard made it to their assigned post).

The question is, however, can the failure to provide a crossing guard constitute negligence on the part of the school district or municipality?

In most circumstances, the answer is a resounding no. At least not in New York.

Here's why:

"Providing crossing guards is one of the governmental functions which is within the discretion of a municipality ( see Vandewinckel v. Northport/East Northport Union Free School Dist., 24 A.D.3d 432, 805 N.Y.S.2d 133). In order to hold a municipality liable for the negligent performance of a governmental function, a plaintiff must establish that a special relationship with the municipality exists ( see Kovit v. Estate of Hallums, 4 N.Y.3d 499, 797 N.Y.S.2d 20, 829 N.E.2d 1188)."

In other words, in order to prevail on a claim that the municipality was negligent in failing to provide crossing guards at that time and place, a plaintiff would be required to prove that the municipality had specifically assumed the responsibility to that particular plaintiff to provide that service. 

Putting it mildly, that is a daunting burden of proof.


Jonathan Cooper
Non-Compete, Trade Secret and School Negligence Lawyer