These outcomes highlight how fact-specific non-compete and restrictive covenant disputes can be in New York. From defending employees against overbroad restrictions to helping businesses respond to client solicitation, confidentiality breaches, and trade secret concerns, each matter reflects a careful strategy built around enforceability, proof, leverage, and practical business realities.
- Page 1
-
Former Sales Executive Has Restrictive Covenant Reduced by 75%, With No Payment0
-
Client Gets Noncompete Halved by Filing Declaratory Judgment Action0
-
Court Dismisses Trade Secret Misappropriation Case Against Former Sales Exec0
-
Client/Ex-Employee Sued for Misappropriation of Confidential Company Info Pays $00
-
Former Employer Sues Over Purported Violation of Noncompete, Ends Up Paying Client $275,000275,000
-
Trial Verdict: Insurance Brokerage Only Entitled to 10% of its Fiduciary Breach Claims$20,000
-
Non-Solicitation Case Against Client Dropped - Client Pays 00
-
Trade Secret Misappropriation Claim Against Client Dismissed0
-
$2,700,000 Settlement for Partner Threatened With NonCompete$2,700,000
-
Threatened With Non-Compete, Former Employer Pays Client $5K
-
In Face of TRO for Violating Non-Compete, Clients Pay $0$0
-
Former Sales Exec Beats Non-Compete, & Keeps New BusinessConfidential